

Amid decreasing demand and rising costs, the U.S. and California wine industry have struggled in recent years. But while some in the industry regard President Donald Trump’s tariff policies as bad for business, others say they could help domestic wine makers, writes CalMatters’ Levi Sumagaysay.
Since the beginning of August, the Trump administration has enacted a 15% tariff on most European goods, including wine. Though negotiations remain ongoing, some American winemakers, restaurant owners and others are urging Trump to exclude European wines from tariffs because of the ripple effects it could have on the wine business ecosystem.
In California especially — which leads the U.S. in wine-related tourism and exports — wine importers, distributors, retailers and restaurants rely on selling European wines for revenue. Their ability to distribute American wine is also influenced by how much other wine they can move.
- Paul Einbund, owner of two Bay Area restaurants: “A lot of my diners just won’t drink domestic (wine). … People up and down the supply chain are in trouble.”
In 2022, California’s wine industry generated about $88 billion and the state’s wine exports totaled $1.3 billion.
But others aren’t entirely convinced that exempting European wines from tariffs would help the ailing industry in the U.S. They argue that since European winemakers are subsidized, California wine producers are already at a disadvantage. The European Union spends more than 1 billion euros a year to help boost European wine, and some countries have their own subsidy programs.
- Richard Samra, a grape grower in the Sacramento Delta and Lodi for 40 years: “U.S. wine grape growers don’t have that. We want to level the playing field. We have plenty of grapes and wine available for sale.”
CalMatters events: On Sept. 17 CalMatters’ Alejandro Lazo will hold a panel to discuss how California can overcome its clean energy challenges as Trump and congressional Republicans work to dismantle key climate policies. Register here to attend in person at Manny’s in San Francisco or virtually.
Other Stories You Should Know
State AG’s status report on Trump lawsuits

From CalMatters’ Mikhail Zinshteyn:
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has sued the Trump administration 37 times in 28 weeks, staving off the president’s efforts to freeze as much as $168 billion in federal funding to California.
That litigation has cost about $5 million — part of the $25 million the state Legislature sent Bonta’s office in early 2025 to bolster California’s legal war chest against anticipated Trump actions.
Bonta’s office documented its legal victories and setbacks in a report submitted to the Legislature last week.
The avoided federal cuts largely stem from a multi-state lawsuit co-led by California to block the Trump administration’s efforts to freeze $3 trillion in federal funding. Bonta’s efforts also helped to restore some federal science funding for universities, while other dollars are still stalled.
The $5 million has been spent on legal staff at the state’s Department of Justice and no money has gone toward outside counsel, Bonta said at a Monday press conference.
CalMatters is tracking Bonta’s suits here.
Bay Area case challenges CA approach to affordable housing

One of the most common methods California uses to create affordable housing could be thrown into question by a recent lawsuit challenging the city of East Palo Alto’s authority to charge a housing fee.
As CalMatters’ Ben Christopher explains, about 149 California cities and counties have “inclusionary zoning” rules that require developers of new housing projects to pay for the state’s shortage of affordable homes. Developers typically do this by setting aside a portion of new units for lower-income tenants, but they can also pay a fee if they refuse.
Last week, East Palo Alto resident Wesley Yu filed a lawsuit in federal court after the city’s inclusionary zoning rules required him to sell or rent out one of the two housing units he was planning to build at an “affordable” rate. If not, he’d have to pay a $54,891 one-time fee.
Describing the fee as “extortion,” Yu and his legal team are relying on a U.S. Supreme Court decision to refute the zoning rules. The high court ruled last year that local governments must show that certain fees they charge builders must be “roughly proportionate” to the fiscal impact of the development.
And lastly: Feeding CA college students

Despite state-funded basic needs centers and food pantries on every campus, many college students still struggle with hunger. Amy Elisabeth Moore of CalMatters’ College Journalism Network and Robert Meeks have a video segment on the creative ways California colleges are feeding students as part of our partnership with PBS SoCal. Watch it here.
SoCalMatters airs at 5:58 p.m. weekdays on PBS SoCal.
California Voices
CalMatters columnist Dan Walters: After former Vice President Kamala Harris declared she would not seek the governorship, the field of candidates remains crowded, and there is no clear frontrunner.
Other things worth your time:
Some stories may require a subscription to read.
TX redistricting move would ‘trigger’ new CA maps, Newsom says // Los Angeles Times
How Big Oil got Newsom to change his tune // Politico
CA conservatives rally to recall Newsom again despite prior failures // The Sacramento Bee
AT&T, ordered to keep providing land-line service, takes fight to CA legislature // The Mercury News
CA bill would require police to disclose use of AI in writing reports // KQED
Some Californians carry passports in fear of ICE. ‘We’re being racially profiled’ // The Fresno Bee
New evacuation warnings issued in SLO County as Gifford Fire grows to 65,000 acres // The Tribune
Calls grow for boosting Mono Lake by easing LA’s water reliance // Los Angeles Times
This post was originally authored and published by Lynn La from Cal Matters via RSS Feed. Join today to get your news feed on Nationwide Report®.

















